Maker of the drug, Lundbeck says:
""The decision not to prescribe anti-depressants to a woman who is depressed... may generate greater risks to the woman and her foetus than the risks of exposure to the medication.""
while earlier in the article is read that the woman had anxiety, and was not depressed.
If I would have the power, I would like to issue another statement:
"Not exposing the members of the board of directors from the major drug companies to a combination of SSRI antidepressants, antipsychotics and MAO-inhibitors for a period of 5 years, all in the highest doses, and afterwardds cold turkey them, is considered less dangerous to society them exposoing them. Therefore they will be forced to take those drugs"
