(second part)

I would therefore the following questions explicitly to ask and expects an honest answer point by point. Perhaps unnecessarily, I ought to say that I will use any response to this letter in my future publications on this topic.

-Realize you that the vague description of "not addictive" very misleading is for both doctors and patients and that many users can not stop or will totally unprepared are affected in terrible misery serious approach divided by this lack of explanation in the package inserts and are damaged?

Do you realize that the existing Directive phasing in increments of 10 mg or in consultation with the attending physician slower, "still extremely vague and unclear, according to many reports for doctors?

-Realize you that this lack of explanation patients, but also doctors themselves to experiment with dosages, and therefore sometimes try to swallow the other day or store which is very dangerous with paroxetine doses about this by the fluctuating mirror unbearable symptoms can cause the brains that never get used slightly lower dose gradually to a step by step?

-How is it possible you think that after the publicity around 2002, the multi-part TV documentary "Paxil Taken on Trust" on the BBC and the tens of thousands of patients reports about unbearable withdrawal symptoms, people in the year 2013 still Paroxetine / Seroxat get prescribed for all kinds of life problems without adequate warning for the withdrawal / withdrawal and the excruciating withdrawal symptoms still are regularly quite wrongly as "relapse or worsening of the underlying disease" dismissed?

-Why GSK in the leaflet not to, such as Wikipedia page with the source is acknowledged to-read under, Seroxat / Paroxetine gives the toughest withdrawal symptoms of all antidepressants, both in terms of opportunity to this as the seriousness of it, so that the patient this note is able to exert in his or her choice of the drug to go away, or first select a drug to a lesser extent, these problems?

Why does GSK hiding behind trials of more than 20 years ago and GSK consistently refuses to take the deluge of information from the user community and to take adequate security measures to protect the health of the users?

What is your opinion about the fact that a foundation Cinderella proposed in easily dosable outfitting strips, paroxetine on the market but the marketing department of the pharmaceutical companies producing "not commercially viable" found?
(Incidentally, already provides the suspension dose on the tenth milli grams and thus relatively safe off to build but appears largely unknown for many people, not like I have a chemical / scientific background, too complicated).
See:

-What steps do GSK put the information leaflets to people who want to reduce / stop now know what they should do? Especially Alone adjust the recommendation to build in steps of 10 mg increments of up to 10% (with minimum of 3 weeks between the steps) and a ferme warning against the alternating dosing is a minimal adaptation at minimal cost people a lot of node-free. misery and suffering can save many people can save lives!

What GSK is going to do for the people who have been badly damaged due to the phase and whose lives are sometimes totally destroyed by the unbearable and persistent extraction / withdrawal problems of Seroxat / Paroxetine?

And finally, when GSK let's really see that she has reformed her life as you can read in previously mentioned article on Artsennet.nl:
"GSK chief executive Andrew Witty has apologized for the misconduct of his company," played out in a different era '.

Either, when GSK's show her compassion in word and deed for the victims of Paxil as a result of the totally inadequate and partly erroneous disclosures about doctors and patients?
And goes approaching to offer assistance are active in these users have sustained injury as a result of the abuses "from a different era" Andrew Witty this euphemistically describes severe and prolonged and there in the present era, the consequences of under find, ?

I'm me there is further of aware that legal action of a private individual now a benefit on bijstandsnivau against a multinational company such as GSK, for a billion fine is a pittance "no chance of winning but I will matter in the coming years very critical and continue to monitor active and happy reach me more and more reports that more doctors are increasingly aware of the enormous controversy surrounding this means and will also contribute within my ability to continue to bring this out into the open and to support their co-victims often heavy and unbearable process of withdrawal from paroxetine.

I look forward to your well-reasoned response.

Sincerely,


Klaas xxxxxxxx

Attachments:
My letter of complaint to the general practice
A summary of the petition site Paxil / Seroxat
A from the heart gripped my contribution on the forum of Tros Radar